Why do I say they are anti-immigration? The convervative govenment introduced many new polies which may seem to help new immigrants. But if you ask people applied for immigration around you, the process basically stopped (including family reunion and skilled workers) since February due to their so called new immigration policy which I don't see any hard proof that it helps new immigrants. And don't forget that Conservative had always been anti-immigrant before they came into power. The reason for so many new pro-immigration policy is because they want to attract new immigrant votes.

And how many Conservative politician send their kids to war?

For middle-class and low-income, spending encouragement does not really help them because they do not have much left to spend anyway. So it is really encourage high income people to spend more which create an illusion that everybody got a tax cut. Those text book, fitness, public transit does help middle-class and low income people a bit. But a lot of it is really "make-look-good" credit. For example, the text book is identical to the monthly tuition credit. So why can't they just increase the monthly tuition amount? Because they want to send a message "Hey, I created something new. Vote for me for more." And it actually works. This gives me an impression that COnservative is election-oriented party. They know how to win election but is not necessarily place the people in mind.

少数党政府导致了国会的扯皮和无效率。既然保守党占据绝大多数支持，应该给保守党一个多数政府的机会，让他有计划的彻底实施其战略。如果有错，他也没有任何借口再诿过于人。目前全球经济受美国的影响进入寒冬，制造业和消费产业一定会冲击很大，银行，投资，房产都可能出现大规模的清盘倒闭。这个时机，自由党的那些社会福利的构想和制造完美家园的理念是不切实际的。我承认保守党彻底上台有可能会伤害移民的利益，随着经济的倒退，反对移民的声音也会出现。但是作为一个执政党，如果真的出现反移民的政策，对加拿大的伤害绝对比经济衰退更加严重。所以我不很担心加拿大对待移民的政策。对外外交是保守党的弱项，同样是自由党的弱项，和中国保持良好关系的那么多年里，加拿大重来没有试图同中国开展双边合作。美国一直是利益优先，而加拿大人只能用有点迂来形容。对外战争是保守党政纲中最大的败笔，同样也是其价值观的体现。出于经济的考量，加拿大也不会很快从阿富汗撤军。无论哪个党上台，结果都是注定的：失败。